Validate your building's maintenance plan in Tasmania — Quarter

In New Zealand? Visit quarter.nz for body corporates.

The plan is what makes the levy honest.

Every building is spending down an asset. The roof, the lifts, the membranes, the paint and the plant all have a service life and a replacement cost, and the only question is whether the body corporate is collecting for them or deferring them. A maintenance plan is how you tell. A plan that is stale, generic or never reviewed does not tell you anything — it just makes the building feel prepared while the gap grows.

Validate your building's maintenance plan in Tasmania

Tasmania requires a sinking fund but does not require a ten-year plan behind it. Combined with a state of mostly small, self-managed schemes, that means the great majority of Tasmanian buildings have no forecast at all — and Tasmanian conditions, particularly wind and moisture on exposed sites, are harder on a building envelope than the mild climate suggests.

Governed by the Strata Titles Act 1998, administered by the Recorder of Titles.

At a glance — TAS

Required
A sinking fund is mandatory. A 10-year plan is not required by the legislation.
Reality
Most Tasmanian schemes are small and self-managed, and most have no forecast.
Conditions
Wind exposure and moisture shorten envelope, coating and fixing lives on exposed sites.
Heritage
Older Tasmanian stock frequently carries heritage constraints that raise repair costs materially.
Best practice
A simple 10-year forecast, resolved and reviewed, even in a four-lot scheme.

How to do it in Tasmania.

  1. 1

    Find out what the sinking fund holds

    In many small schemes the honest answer is 'not much, and nobody has asked why'.

    In Quarter: Upload the plan you already have and Quarter reads it into a costed schedule of items, lifecycles and due years. From there it projects the fund thirty years out and tells you the annual contribution that actually funds it.

    Find out what the sinking fund holds in Quarter
  2. 2

    Get an inspection-based forecast

    It does not have to be elaborate. It does have to be based on somebody looking at the building.

    In Quarter: Quotes, studies, assessments and correspondence attach to the decision that authorised them, so the file an assessor, an owner or a buyer's solicitor asks for is already assembled.

    Get an inspection-based forecast in Quarter
  3. 3

    Account for heritage constraints

    Where they apply they change repair costs substantially, and generic templates ignore them.

  4. 4

    Resolve the forecast and a review cycle

    At a general meeting, minuted, so it outlives the current owners.

  5. 5

    Set contributions against it

    Small, regular contributions beat a special levy in a scheme where four owners share everything.

    In Quarter: The plan's required contribution feeds the budget, and approving the budget raises the levies from it — so what owners pay is derived from the plan rather than from last year's number plus a bit.

    Set contributions against it in Quarter
  6. 6

    Keep the maintenance record

    What was done and when. It is what makes the next forecast accurate.

    In Quarter: The ownership register, financial records, insurance, contracts and documents sit in one searchable place, so a handover is an export rather than an archaeology project — and they are still there when the committee turns over.

    Keep the maintenance record in Quarter

Where TAS buildings get caught.

No forecast at all

The Tasmanian default, and the reason repairs arrive as special levies.

Ignoring heritage costs

They are frequently the largest single variance from a template estimate.

Contributions set by habit

A figure unchanged for a decade is a figure that was wrong for nine years.

Why a plan on file is not the same as a plan that works

Most buildings have something. Far fewer have a plan that reflects the building as it actually is, costed at what work actually costs now, and matched to what the contributions actually raise.

An old plan understates everything
Construction costs rose sharply from 2020. A plan built on pre-2020 numbers is not conservative — it is wrong, by a compounding margin.
A generic plan describes a building you do not own
Plans produced from a template rather than an inspection miss the things that are specific to your building, which are exactly the expensive things.
A plan nobody sets levies against changes nothing
The value is not the document. It is the contribution rate it implies, applied.
The special levy is the bill for not having one
Deferred maintenance does not go away. It arrives as a lump sum, usually at the worst time for the owners least able to pay it.

How Quarter keeps the plan honest

A plan is only as good as the maintenance record behind it and the budget in front of it. Quarter connects the three.

The plan and the real work in one place

What the plan said would happen, and what actually happened. The gap between them is the most useful number a committee has.

Levies set against the plan

Budget from the plan's contribution rate rather than from last year's figure plus a bit.

Review dates that arrive on time

Where a review is required, it is tracked as an obligation with a date, not a good intention.

Every asset with a history

Repairs, quotes, invoices and warranties attached to the thing they were for, so the next plan review starts from evidence.

Owners can see the position

What the fund holds, what the plan says it needs, and the difference — visible, so a levy increase is a conversation rather than an ambush.

Questions we get asked.

How long should the plan cover?
It depends where you are, and the answer ranges from ten years to thirty. The more useful test is whether it covers the building's longest-lived expensive components. A ten-year plan for a building with a lift due for replacement in year twelve is a plan with the worst news left out.
Who should prepare it?
A quantity surveyor or a building consultant who inspects the building. The distinguishing feature of a good plan is that somebody walked the site. Desktop plans built from the plan drawings and a cost table are cheaper and worth roughly what they cost.
How much should the fund hold?
There is no universal number, and any rule of thumb quoted as a percentage of anything should be treated with suspicion. The right amount is whatever the plan says, given your building's components, their condition and their remaining life.
What if we are already behind?
Then you find out by how much, and over what period you can catch up. A building that knows it is behind and is closing the gap on a schedule is in a far better position than one that has not looked — including at sale, when a buyer's solicitor asks.

Where this comes from

General information about Tasmania, not legal or financial advice for your building. Legislation is amended and grant programmes open and close — check the current position with the Recorder of Titles or the administering body before you act on anything here.

Validate your maintenance plan — elsewhere

Other things to get done in TAS

Get this one off the list.

Tell us about your building in Tasmania and we will show you exactly how Quarter would run it.