Validate your building's maintenance plan in New South Wales — Quarter

In New Zealand? Visit quarter.nz for body corporates.

The plan is what makes the levy honest.

Every building is spending down an asset. The roof, the lifts, the membranes, the paint and the plant all have a service life and a replacement cost, and the only question is whether the owners corporation is collecting for them or deferring them. A maintenance plan is how you tell. A plan that is stale, generic or never reviewed does not tell you anything — it just makes the building feel prepared while the gap grows.

Validate your building's maintenance plan in New South Wales

New South Wales requires every strata scheme to prepare a ten-year plan for its capital works fund, and from 1 April 2026 every new or revised plan must use a mandatory standard form. That is a significant change: it makes plans comparable, it makes gaps visible, and it removes the option of a plan that says whatever its author chose to include. Fair Trading also provides a capital works fund planner through the Strata Hub.

Governed by the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015, administered by NSW Fair Trading.

At a glance — NSW

Required
A 10-year plan for the capital works fund, under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015.
Standard form
From 1 April 2026, plans prepared, revised or replaced must use the mandatory standard form.
Tool
NSW Fair Trading provides a capital works fund planner through the Strata Hub.
Review
Reviewed at least every five years, and revisited annually when the budget is set.
Enforcement
The 2025 reforms strengthened Fair Trading's powers over repair, maintenance and financial management.
At the AGM
The plan should sit alongside the budget so owners can see what the levies are funding.

How to do it in New South Wales.

  1. 1

    Find the plan and its date

    Not the summary in the AGM papers — the plan. If nobody can produce it, that is the finding.

    In Quarter: Upload the plan you already have and Quarter reads it into a costed schedule of items, lifecycles and due years. From there it projects the fund thirty years out and tells you the annual contribution that actually funds it.

    Find the plan and its date in Quarter
  2. 2

    Check it against the standard form

    Plans prepared or revised from 1 April 2026 must use it. A plan that predates it is not invalid, but the next revision has to comply.

  3. 3

    Test the costs against today

    If the costings predate 2021, they understate the work by a compounding margin.

  4. 4

    Compare the contribution rate to what you actually levy

    This is the entire exercise. The plan implies a rate; the budget sets one. The difference is your deferred liability.

    In Quarter: The plan's required contribution feeds the budget, and approving the budget raises the levies from it — so what owners pay is derived from the plan rather than from last year's number plus a bit.

    Compare the contribution rate to what you actually levy in Quarter
  5. 5

    Commission a revision if the gap is real

    A revised plan on the standard form, from an inspection, not a desktop update.

  6. 6

    Set next year's levies from it

    A plan that does not change the budget has not done anything.

Where NSW buildings get caught.

A plan that exists but has never moved a levy

The most common NSW situation, and the most expensive.

Desktop revisions

Updating the numbers without inspecting the building misses condition, which is the point.

Treating the standard form as a formatting exercise

It is designed to expose gaps. Use it that way.

Why a plan on file is not the same as a plan that works

Most buildings have something. Far fewer have a plan that reflects the building as it actually is, costed at what work actually costs now, and matched to what the levies actually raise.

An old plan understates everything
Construction costs rose sharply from 2020. A plan built on pre-2020 numbers is not conservative — it is wrong, by a compounding margin.
A generic plan describes a building you do not own
Plans produced from a template rather than an inspection miss the things that are specific to your building, which are exactly the expensive things.
A plan nobody sets levies against changes nothing
The value is not the document. It is the contribution rate it implies, applied.
The special levy is the bill for not having one
Deferred maintenance does not go away. It arrives as a lump sum, usually at the worst time for the owners least able to pay it.

How Quarter keeps the plan honest

A plan is only as good as the maintenance record behind it and the budget in front of it. Quarter connects the three.

The plan and the real work in one place

What the plan said would happen, and what actually happened. The gap between them is the most useful number a committee has.

Levies set against the plan

Budget from the plan's contribution rate rather than from last year's figure plus a bit.

Review dates that arrive on time

Where a review is required, it is tracked as an obligation with a date, not a good intention.

Every asset with a history

Repairs, quotes, invoices and warranties attached to the thing they were for, so the next plan review starts from evidence.

Owners can see the position

What the fund holds, what the plan says it needs, and the difference — visible, so a levy increase is a conversation rather than an ambush.

Questions we get asked.

How long should the plan cover?
It depends where you are, and the answer ranges from ten years to thirty. The more useful test is whether it covers the building's longest-lived expensive components. A ten-year plan for a building with a lift due for replacement in year twelve is a plan with the worst news left out.
Who should prepare it?
A quantity surveyor or a building consultant who inspects the building. The distinguishing feature of a good plan is that somebody walked the site. Desktop plans built from the plan drawings and a cost table are cheaper and worth roughly what they cost.
How much should the fund hold?
There is no universal number, and any rule of thumb quoted as a percentage of anything should be treated with suspicion. The right amount is whatever the plan says, given your building's components, their condition and their remaining life.
What if we are already behind?
Then you find out by how much, and over what period you can catch up. A building that knows it is behind and is closing the gap on a schedule is in a far better position than one that has not looked — including at sale, when a buyer's solicitor asks.

Where this comes from

General information about New South Wales, not legal or financial advice for your building. Legislation is amended and grant programmes open and close — check the current position with NSW Fair Trading or the administering body before you act on anything here.

Validate your maintenance plan — elsewhere

Other things to get done in NSW

Get this one off the list.

Tell us about your building in New South Wales and we will show you exactly how Quarter would run it.